Anybody that has an operation to control people
has apparently tried to work this operation on the basis of keeping them
from looking at the mind, because ALL the mechanisms of control are
resident IN the mind, and if the mind was much looked at, it would as-is.
Therefore, with it would as-is these mechanisms of slavery and control.
If you sowed in enough "not-looks," you
would render a person so introverted, he would be very easy, very simple
to control. He'd be nothing but an automaton. If you can't look, if you
don't look, and if nobody is trying to get you to look, these mechanisms
all add up to slavery mechanisms of introversion.
If that is the bulk of the thing which has been on the whole track, and it
IS, what do you expect the whole track's condition to be like? The overts
of making people introverted so they could be controlled, and the
motivators are getting introverted so one was controlled, and the common
denominator of the whole thing was "don't look." Looking inward
carries with it "pulling inward." (1962, Whole Track, Lecture: 6201C25)
(Mind) Control