DM has a meeting with the OT VIIIs. He tells them that the OT 7 course did not work, was not working, and had to be re-engineered. They
would all have to do OT 7 again. In addition, the 1200 people would have to pay the
increased price. (Criminal Time Track:
Issue III, (13))
What he doesn’t tell them is that his squirreling of OT 7 and OT 8 is resulting in people on OT 7 & OT 8 dying, having psychotic breaks, and
leaving the church.
Due to the confidential nature of OT 7 & 8, we cannot elaborate here on
just exactly how they have squirreled these two levels. But, you can know that they did squirrel it by the fact of people on those levels dying, having
psychotic breaks, and leaving the church. You don’t think that standard
tech causes that do you? That tells you tech is out.
The other thing that tells you tech is out is the fact that it has been 19 years since the release of OT 7 and there has not been one actual
completion, yet.
The GOLDEN AGE OF SQUIRRELING is killing your fellow Scientologists. Isn’t
it about time that you took responsibility for doing something about Miscavige before his squirreling kills anyone else? If nothing else, you can
pass this time track around so everyone knows.
We are not "Davidologists". We are Scientologists. Let’s get this
1.1 criminal suppressive squirrel out of our Church and get back to being on source.
Some so-called Scientologists, afraid and lacking confront, offer up justifiers for all this.
We have heard all the justifiers. They are suppressive. Here’s why:
HCOPL 7 December 1969 The Ethics Officer, His Character
Reasonableness is suppressive since it lets oppression continue without action being taken.
Suppressive reasonableness is a common trait. It comes from THE INABILITY TO CONFRONT EVIL. (Criminal Time Track:
Issue III)
Randy McDonald writes a High Crime Report on David Miscavige:
David Miscavige is charged with Felony Fraud and the suppression of Scientology and Scientologists.
Miscavige has been engaged in a covert but methodical campaign to alter, alloy, negate, and even eradicate parts of LRH’s technology, then sell the
alter-ised versions to staff and public while he uses his position over Scientology and Scientologists to assert the "purity" of the tech.
It is Felony Corporate and Trademark Fraud involving millions of dollars; it crosses State lines and utilizes U.S. mails which makes it a Federal
offense…
Evidence of Felony Fraud
Authorization of Altered LRH Materials
As the head of RTC, Miscavige has defrauded the public and staffs out of millions of dollars by approving and overseeing the promotion and sales of
works, carrying the trademarks of LRH and Scientology, that are proclaimed by him as being "100% pure, unadulterated" LRH tech, knowing that
the works have been cut, rewritten, edited, and altered. Miscavige’s own writings
stand as testament to his knowledge of the condition of published materials:
"RTC ….passes any LRH issue, pack or book before issuance so as to
ensure it is authentic and that the writings are one hundred percent Source. In the
case of published or translated LRH works, RTC checks every word to verify they are completely faithful to the original LRH manuscripts."
David Miscavige – Chairman of the Board, Religious Technology Center But here are a few examples of the truth:
A. Entire paragraphs have been carefully and seamlessly edited out of the current edition of LRH’s Study Tapes in such a way that the listener has no
knowledge that they are gone unless he does a side-by-side comparison to an unedited set of tapes.
B. HCOPL 13 March 1969 Addition To HCO Pol Ltr of 23 June 1967 ‘Policies On
Physical Healing, Insanity And Potential Trouble Sources’ ----Potential Trouble Source (b) is missing.
C. The "Life Improvement" courses, plus the "Scientology
Handbook" contain altered and edited LRH tech mixed in with material written by
unknown others. Advertised as "based on the works of L. Ron Hubbard," these
are an undifferentiated mish-mash of LRH’s writings and the writings of others.
Below is but one example:
HERE IS THE ORGINAL LRH REFERENCE
"First consider a group which takes in money but does not deliver anything in exchange. This is called rip-off. It is the
'exchange'
condition of robbers, tax men, governments and other criminal elements." HCOPL 10 September 1982 Finance Series 36
HERE IS THE "LIFE IMPROVEMENT COURSE" VERSION
"First consider the group which takes in money but does not deliver anything in exchange. This is called rip-off. It is the ‘exchange’
condition of robbers, most tax men, many governments and criminal elements."
(From The Dynamics of Money course workbook)
These edits, deletions, eradications, and adulterations of LRH’s tech are,
every one, High Crimes and Suppressive Acts. All of this tampering is a flagrant violation of Keeping Scientology Working, and is expressly
forbidden in many of LRH’s HCOPLs – which constitute a promise to people who
purchase Scientology materials and services that what they are getting is straight LRH:
"All materials released, used or sold must be straight Scientology as
given in the writings or lectures of LRH… Books may not be advertised for sale
or the advertisement paid for from HCO Book fund except LRH books…" HCOPL 4 March 1965 Technical and Policy Distribution
"The public wants Scientology Ron’s brand and they don’t buy other
brands." HCOPL 27 December 1963 The Magic of Good Management
"The field or public must not be led to believe that I have written or issued things I have not."
HCOPL 21 June 1959 Signatures On Bulletins, Policies and Sec Eds
These assurances, an integral and vital part of Scientology, are held sacred and inviolable by Scientologists. Selling anything else to the buying public
using LRH’s name and his trademarks is Felony Fraud.
But this is not the only avenue for fraud used by Miscavige. Scientology Policy Directives (SPDs) now number over 200. None were authored by
LRH and no such issue is mentioned by him in any HCOPL. Under Miscavige’s supervision, though, SPD’s are approved for issue by RTC’s AVC
division.
With Miscavige’s approval, SPDs have been issued and enforced under the fraudulent claim that they are policy for Churches. This claim can be
found in the back of the current edition of OEC Volume O: "Scientology Policy Directives – its purpose is to provide an issue
type for policy for the Church of Scientology, and to distinguish from policy issued
by LRH which is issued in HCO PL form. Senior to all administrative issues except HCOPLs and any other issues or advices by LRH. Its distribution is
all staff unless otherwise designated. Black ink on blue paper."
This seeks to negate all of the following LRH references:
"If it is not in an HCO Policy Letter, it is not policy." HCOPL 5 March 1965 Policy, Source Of
"If it isn’t in an HCOB or an HCO Pol Ltr or recorded on tape in my
voice, it isn’t tech or policy." HCOPL 16 April AD 15 The Hidden Data Line
"A policy letter is not Scientology org policy unless written or
authorized by L. Ron Hubbard and passed as a resolution or covered by blanket resolution of the International Board and issued or published by an HCO. It
is not policy if any of these steps are missing." HCOPL 5 March 1965 Policy Source Of
"STANDARD ADMIN means the usual ‘on-policy’ procedure applied. The
source of STANDARD ADMIN is an HCO Policy Letter." HCOPL 4 June 1971 Standard Admin
The above references unequivocally, unquestionably, incontestably SLAM THE DOOR on any possibility of SPDs being policy, as is claimed. Yet,
Miscavige and AVC and others have been made aware, in several reports, of this glaring
violation of LRH’s policy, and no action has been taken to correct it. On the contrary, OSA staff (a non-Source entity established by SPDs) have been
sent to investigate the report writers.
"…If correctly reported outnesses that threaten the org are NOT
corrected then one assumes that suppression exists... It occasionally happens that it
is someone high up in the org. It sometimes happens his (Ethics Officer’s) seniors or the Executive Council scold him for daring to report on things or
to them. Then he knows the suppression is high up… HCOPL 7 December 1969 Ethics, The Design Of
And so none of this gets corrected. And so this Felony Fraud is perpetrated on the public:
What the public believes (and pays to support with donations) to be standard, on-policy, on-source organizations, each of them carrying the
trademarks of LRH, are actually being run off of squirrel Scientology Policy Directives (written by anonymous others), many of which directly
contradict LRH policy.
Here are just a few examples of SPDs that attempt to negate LRH’s tech:
WHAT THE SPD SAYS:
"There is no practice of disconnection allowed in the Church of Scientology."
Watchdog Committee
SPD # 28 Suppressive Act
WHAT LRH SAYS:
"The bare fact is that disconnection is a vital tool in handling PTSness and can be very effective when used correctly…The technology of
disconnection is essential in the handling of potential trouble sources. It can and has saved lives and untold trouble and upset. It must be preserved
and used correctly." HCOPL 10 September 1982 Disconnection
WHAT THE SPD SAYS:
"Course completion. 2000 points"
SPD # 6, 6 August 1990 The Standard Student Points System
WHAT LRH SAYS:
"Course completion…200 points."
HCOPL 18 April 1981 The Standard Student Points System
Miscavige is guilty of the following High Crimes:
"Intentional and unauthorized alteration of LRH technology, policy,
issues or checksheets."
"Issuing alter-ised Scientology technical data or information or instructional or admin procedures, calling it Scientology or calling it
something else to confuse or deceive people as to the true source, beliefs and practices of Scientology."
"Falsely attributing or falsely representing oneself or others as source
of Scientology or Dianetics technology; or using any position gained with staff and/or public to falsely attribute non-source material to source or to
falsely represent non-source material as authorized Scientology or Dianetics technology."
"Using Scientology (or perverted and alter-ised tech and calling it Scientology) harmfully so as to bring about disrepute to an org, group, or
Scientology itself." (Criminal Time Track:
Issue III, (50))
David and Julie Mayo receive a favorable decision from the 9th Circuit Court
of Appeal.
It overturns the lower court’s decision to grant RTC an injunction against
Mayo using the Advanced Technology. It also affirms the lower court’s decision
to award Mayo 2.9 million dollars in his counterclaim against RTC. (Criminal Time Track:
Issue III, (12, 18))
1996